<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Neue Kritik am deutschen Bad Bank Gesetz und toxische Papiere weiter auf Stabilisierungskurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blicklog.com/2009/06/03/neue-kritik-am-deutschen-bad-bank-gesetz-und-toxische-papiere-weiter-auf-stabilisierungskurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blicklog.com/2009/06/03/neue-kritik-am-deutschen-bad-bank-gesetz-und-toxische-papiere-weiter-auf-stabilisierungskurs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=neue-kritik-am-deutschen-bad-bank-gesetz-und-toxische-papiere-weiter-auf-stabilisierungskurs</link>
	<description>Notizen über Wirtschaft, Finanzen, Management und mehr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Ulf</title>
		<link>http://www.blicklog.com/2009/06/03/neue-kritik-am-deutschen-bad-bank-gesetz-und-toxische-papiere-weiter-auf-stabilisierungskurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blicklog.com/2009/06/03/neue-kritik-am-deutschen-bad-bank-gesetz-und-toxische-papiere-weiter-auf-stabilisierungskurs/#comment-1580</guid>
		<description>Hier ein Interviewauszug zum aktuellen Stand der Bewertungstechnik:

...Wilmott spends a lot of time with another former student trying to tackle the biggest problem facing quant finance right now: how to price all those CDOs sitting on the balance sheets of banks, the toxic assets we hear so much about. &quot;We don&#039;t have the tools yet to truly price them,&quot; Wilmott says. &quot;People thought we did, but they were nowhere near robust enough.&quot;...

http://www.newsweek.com/id/200015/page/3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hier ein Interviewauszug zum aktuellen Stand der Bewertungstechnik:</p>
<p>&#8230;Wilmott spends a lot of time with another former student trying to tackle the biggest problem facing quant finance right now: how to price all those CDOs sitting on the balance sheets of banks, the toxic assets we hear so much about. &#8220;We don&#8217;t have the tools yet to truly price them,&#8221; Wilmott says. &#8220;People thought we did, but they were nowhere near robust enough.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/200015/page/3" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/200015/page/3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

